Posted by Charlotte Traffic Attorney
BY JESSICA STEPHEN
Kenosha News
Last year, 528 people went to jail because they didn’t pay municipal fines in Kenosha.
That’s 215 more than in 2008.
And that’s a sign of the recession, Kenosha Municipal Judge John A. Neuenschwander said.
“The face of the recession is definitely visible in my court,” Neuenschwander said. “The incarcerations, unfortunately, are related.”
Details about jail time served for unpaid fines in 2009, as well as predictions on how changes to drunken driving and auto insurance laws might affect the court in 2010, were outlined in Neuenschwander’s annual report, which was released last week.
Unable to pay
Last year, people faced with fines often found themselves unable to pay within 60 to 90 days, the typical time frame for resolving a ticket. People had lost their jobs, their unemployment benefits had run out or the benefits were never available at all.
Neuenschwander approved payment plans for many people.
“If they say they can pay $20 a month on a $100 fine and pay it in five months, I’m satisfied,” he said.
But if people couldn’t make payments or, even worse, never tried to set up a payment plan at all, Neuenschwander said jail time was the way the debt was resolved.
Changes for 2011
Neuenschwander couldn’t predict whether orders for jail time, also known as commitments, would fall off before next year; much probably depends on the economy.
But he expected changes in drunken-driving laws would mean more attorneys fees and other expenses for first-time offenders into 2011.
That’s because ignition interlock devices now must be ordered for drivers with a 0.15 or higher blood alcohol content on their first offense. Ignition interlock, which tests drivers’ breath before allowing them to start or continue driving a vehicle, also must be ordered for those who refuse a breath or blood test when stopped for suspected drunken driving.
Neuenschwander expected more people would challenge those cases and bring lawyers with them; traditionally, people represent themselves in municipal court.
Expensive interlocks
At an estimated $1,000 per car per year for interlock, all charged to the driver, Neuenschwander expected the fees for drunken driving-related monitoring to add up fast. That could be especially true for married couples, because the law says devices must be installed on any car registered under the driver’s name.
As with fines, Neuenschwander said drivers in that situation could ask for a good cause/poverty hearing, which would help determine whether the person has the ability to pay.
For ignition interlock, Neuenschwander could approve a 50 percent discount for those who qualify.
Car insurance laws
As for the new car insurance laws — drivers now are required to have insurance and carry proof of that insurance or faces fines — Neuenschwander expected to stick with a plan worked out with the city attorney’s office.
If drivers don’t have insurance, but get it by the time they appear in municipal court, the $114 fine would be reduced, Neuenschwander said.
Those caught without proof of insurance could get that $10 fine taken care of by bringing their insurance cards to court.
What is municipal court?
Municipal courts deal with non-criminal traffic offenses, which accounted for 78 percent of cases in Municipal Judge John A. Neuenschwander’s court in 2009, according to his annual report.
Tickets issued for community violations, such as loud music, loose dogs or disorderly conduct, made up the other 22 percent of the court’s caseload.
When people don’t pay traffic tickets, municipal judges have the power to suspend their driver’s licenses for up to two years.
Not so for community violations; state law prohibits municipal judges from taking away driving privileges for non-traffic violations.
Instead, a judge can order people to jail, where their debt is repaid at a rate of $25 to $35 per day, up to $500; the repayment rate will increase to $50 in January 2011.
Tweet This Post